In general, I will not make an agreement for ongoing services unless we have had a meeting where the “dirty laundry” has been licked. This is convenient from my point of view (how do I agree with an amount/fee if we both don`t understand the nature of the problem) and I believe it is also from the client`s point of view (if there are problems I know of from a colleague who can help them better than me, I would like to have the flexibility, to offer cooperation or to cooperate with the colleague). If the client is striving to reach an agreement, I would recommend agreeing to an initial consultation/needs analysis, with the option of continuing beyond. During this first phase of consultation, issues such as respect for confidentiality can also be developed. I have heard that several speakers have expressed different concerns. Some fear that another person will wipe its contents and make a goat out of it (or simply act as if it were their idea). On the other hand, many activists I know put a Creative Commons license on their presentations. CC has different flavors, ranging from the wide open “Do whatever you want, including grinding and reusing in derivative works” to “reusing as looking, with attribution” and more. .@JanssenGlobal contributed with a #patientengagement inspiring initiative to the first edition of the Book of Good Practices (see t.co/ND0YSxKLNp). I look forward to their contribution for the 3rd edition 🔜 Apply now: t.co/X9W7nAw3tZ pic.twitter.com/WNQYbygBWg 1. It is clear that you know what your value is and that you can easily indicate where this value is not properly taken into account. I think most patient voices don`t have this skill at first and gain it over time. I don`t know the people involved in these companies (or their track record), so I can`t say anything about their motivations, excellence, etc.
But as this series has said, one of the reasons treaties exist is that the future is unpredictable, and in the absence of a binding agreement, a situation is unmanaged and risky. It is recommended to adapt, on a case-by-case basis, to national legislation and language requirements. Benchmark agreements are a reasonable approach, but are not intended to replace appropriate legal advice on the agreements in question. This is a comprehensive contract that can be processed easily to protect the interests of the organizer or speaker or host. Supplement 30. October 2014: In the comments began a carnal discussion on a topic that is related but different – NDA (non-disclosure agreements). They are rarely created at conferences, but they can often be part of the “patient engagement business”. Look around if you are interested. Personally, I added a copyright note to the slide template, with this additional line: “Please contact via epatientdave.com before reusing it.” That`s because I want my ideas to spread, but I`d like to know who is doing it! 🙂 “I used the format of the compromise agreement for planned redundancy and found the contents and guidelines extremely comprehensive and useful.” MSAW represents all RAPP project partners with legal expertise in patient representation and pharmaceutical companies….